Wednesday, April 14, 2010

The definition of "indisputable"

Tuesday night, April 13, 2010
To:  the Atlanta Cracker
From: the Nachoman

Thanks for obtaining prizes for last weekend's physics fights.  I especially liked the hanging tomato grower!  Oh, and the umpires used a 5 minute replay review to reverse a Jay Bruce home run, even though the Reds broadcasters thought the ball was fair from their replay. (I was watching on extra-low def internet video, so I couldn't tell.) Now the game is tied at 8 in the 8th, 'cause a reliever walked a guy with a three-run lead and then gave up a tying homer.  Guh. 


To: the Nachoman
From: the Atlanta Cracker
Nice. What's the definition of "indisputable" again? Or is that word not in the MLB replay policy?


To: the Atlanta Cracker
From: the Nachoman

No idea. The MLB replay policy appears to be identical to that of the NFL, NCAA football, and NCAA basketball -- Stop the game and take 5-10 minutes to agonize over an issue that could be resolved in 30 seconds if the organization were willing to say "Can't tell, let's move on."


P.S. The Reds game went to extras, then the Reds took advantage of the Marlins reliever who gave up two walks, and would have had more than two runs but for an amazing catch on a Cabrera drive.  F. Cordero actually looked good getting the save.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Rays Haze

I just watched the video highlight of Carl Crawford's walkoff double to defeat Peter Angelos.  Sure, it's an exciting baseball play, well-called by the play-by-play man.  What ELSE do you notice?

I thought there was old-fashioned TV static on my internet video.  On further reading, I found out that a haze had settled in over the Trop, St. Petersburg's indoor stadium that is second only to old Olympic stadium for charm.  Why the haze?

During player introductions, the Rays used elaborate smokey special effects to heighten the excitment of opening day.  (Traditionalists such as the Nachoman scoff scoffingly at such gimmickry.  If a fan needs more than organ music to feel excited on opening day, than he is no fan.)

Problem is, the Trop is an indoor stadium.  INDOOR!  I've been annoyed at Reds games in an OUTDOOR stadium when the brief smoke effects after a home run drift into the crowd and reduce visibility for a half inning.  The Tampa smoke hung around until the end of the game.

I continue to wonder at how baseball manages to survive when marketing geniuses like these are in charge.  I'd rather watch Schotzie the Elephant.

NM

Monday, April 5, 2010

How far will YOU go to avoid Joe Morgan's commentary?

Okay, that was exciting... I'm listening to the Yanks-Sox in Spanish via Gameday Audio. No, I don't speak a word of Spanish, but nevertheless this is far more enjoyable than Joe Morgan. The call of Granderson's home run was especially fun (possibly because Mr. Granderson is on my fantasy team). Not that I knew what the announcer said, but he said it well.


FYI, I did the same thing for World Cup 2006. I entered the room with some (American) friends to watch the US game, and an Argentinian had the Spanish broadcast on. She offered to switch, and every one of us said, emphatically, "NO!" We all preferred to hear knowledgable, experienced, and properly trained broadcasters in a different language than random ignorant American play-by-play man who's trying his best with random-veteran-of-1994 USA team who has no ability on air but got the job anyway.

That's today's rant. Back to grading ray diagrams.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Ramon Hernandez -- Don't underestimate the value of Spanish

Last week I acquired the 2010 Baseball Prospectus, the tome that's home to the best writing and statistical analysis available in the preseason.  I'm disappointed that the authors deliberately choose not to organize their statistics in aggregate tables -- after all, the primary purpose of such statistical season previews is to assist fantasy baseball owners with their drafts.  The BP folks are banking on the fact that readers won't mind paying online for a sortable spreadsheet.  Pah, I say.  I feel like I bought a car, but the tires cost extra.

Anyway.  On to BP's commentary on the Reds. 

The Reds section includes three separate comments about the Ryan Hanigan / Ramon Hernandez combination at catcher.  BP points out, quite reasonably, that Mr. Hanigan had a slightly better year than Mr. Hernandez in 2009, Mr. Hanigan is an inexpensive player relative to the $3 million that Mr. Hernandez just signed for, and Mr. Hanigan is the younger player with a higher long-term upside.  BP criticizes Reds general Manager Walt Jocketty harshly for paying a premium for Mr. Hernandez; they mock Mr. Jocketty for his publicly stated rationale that Hernandez brings "veteran leadership." 

In the world of baseball statistics, "leadership" and other intangibles probably don't exist, and if they do, they certainly aren't worth a million dollars.

Now, Baseball Prospectus did not contact Mr. Jocketty or the Reds to discuss the Hernandez signing.  I don't know that they would have gotten a useful answer if they had attempted to obtain a comment -- baseball GMs are not known for their frank honesty when dealing with the media.  But I wonder if BP overlooked and underestimated the language issue.

As I understand it, Ramon Hernandez speaks fluent Spanish, and Ryan Hanigan does not.  (If I am mistaken here, I would love someone to correct me.  I do not have the access to find out if I'm wrong.)

Consider the Reds starting pitching.  The team hopes to make their rotation the bedrock of a team that can win several division titles.  Look at the players and their native languages.

Aaron Harang, a solid veteran and one-time ace whose performance has slipped recently, is from San Diego.  He almost definitely doesn't speak Spanish.

Bronson Arroyo, a "veteran league average innings eater," in BP's estimation, was born in Key West to a Cuban family.  He almost definitely DOES speak at least some Spanish; chances are he's rather fluent.

Behind these two veterans are the young pitchers the Reds are counting on to lead them out of the NL Central depths:

Johnny Cueto, from the Dominican Republic.  Native Spanish speaker.

Edinson Volquez, also from the DR.  Native Spanish speaker.  [Mr. Volquez will not be back on the roster until midseason due to injury.]

And, most importantly...

Aroldis Chapman, the Reds newest signee, straight off the Cuban national team.  With the fortune the Reds have given Mr. Chapman, it is in the organization's interest to do everything possible to ensure his success. 

How many times have we seen a foreign player struggle mightily in his rookie season because of the considerable cultural adjustment?  Mr. Chapman in particular is going to experience possibly the biggest possible one-year swing in his social, cultural, and economic status.  He's going from, essentially, Cuban peasant to American zillionaire.  As far as I know. Mr. Chapman doesn't have any family or established relationships in America.  He will be left to deal with the transition on his own, and with help from his teammates.

Who's going to tell Mr. Chapman the difference between a legitimate financial advisor and the unscrupulous sharks who want him to fund their Madoff-style schemes?  Who's going to confront Mr. Chapman when he's made too many late night Taco Bell runs?  Who is going to listen to and understand Mr. Chapman's adjustment issues?

While they might not be able to RELATE to Chapman's issues, the Spanish speakers on the roster will at least have the language skills to UNDERSTAND what Mr. Chapman is saying.  Mssrs. Cueto and Volquez will have gone through something similar over the past few years -- but they are still learning the ropes of major league life themselves. 

And here is the hole that Ramon Hernandez can fill.  It is likely that Mr. Jocketty expects Mr. Hernandez to be as much coach as player to the predominantly young and predominantly Spanish-speaking starting pitchers.  Sure, Ryan Hanigan is the better hitter with the better arm and more potential.  But Hernandez might be better for his teammates.


Sunday, January 10, 2010

Chapman?


The Nachoman's Cubs correspondent Deep Dish writes in to ask about the Reds signing of Aroldis Chapman.


1.  I trust Walt Jocketty.
2.  $5 mil per year isn't really that much, as major league pitchers go.
3.  I don't believe the 102 mph baloney for a second.  Remember the "gyroball?"
4.  I'm much more worried about Rolen's contract.  I like him, but isn't he older than me?
5.  I'd be a whole lot more confident if I thought the Reds had a decent pitching coach.  Can we please steal Dave Duncan or Leo Mazzone?  Mazzone is broadcasting, for Bob's sake, he's available!
6.  Isn't Havana the best possible expansion city for MLB?  Can someone please just "dissapear" whichever Castro is in charge so we can put a team there?

NM

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Hey, Deadspin, it's Karch Kiraly! AP Physics is how I knew.


This December 22 Deadspin post asks readers to identify the man to the right.  I knew right away it must be the best known volleyball player of the 80s and 90s, Mr. Karch Kiraly.  I was right -- take a look here, or check several pages worth of Google image searches.

How did I recognize this somewhat obscure character?  AP Physics.

Each June I read thousands of AP Physics exams.  Last year I was a table leader for problem 5.  One of the members of my group was the multitalented Eric Plett, who teaches at Junipero Serra High School in San Mateo, CA.  Eric is himself a kick-butt swimmer and volleyball player.  He arrived at the pool each morning at 6:30 to work out with another physics teacher from Wisconsin -- I enjoyed the daily recaps of their races*.

Anyway, I remembered Eric discussing how people think him a dead ringer for Karch Kiraly.  And when I saw the picture above, I said, "What's Eric Plett doing in Deadspin?"

Now, imagine that Mr. Plett were to give his AP Physics reading invitation to Mr. Kiraly.  How long, do you think, could Mr. Kiraly last before he were found out as not-a-physics-teacher?  Bids start at two minutes.

NM

*I enjoyed them all the moreso because *I* was usually still asleep at 6:30.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Yes, I swear to the Almighty Bob, this conversation happened



Sunday afternoon, El Mole and I saw the Redskins miss the 23 yard field goal, leaving Drew Brees and the Saints under two minutes and 77 yards to go to tie or win the game. 

I turned to El Mole.  "So, how many plays will it take for Brees to score?  Over or under, say, five?"

"Hmmm," replied El Mole.  "I'd go with exactly five."

We noted that neither of us had any doubt whatsoever that the Saints would, in fact, score the touchdown. 

When the Brees-to-Meachem 53 yard touchdown occurred on the FIFTH play of the Saints drive, there was much rejoicing in the Nachoman household.*

*Except for by Burrito Girl, who didn't care.